Replied to a tweet thread by John Mark Troyer (Twitter)

Blogs are designed to never end, only show the last thing you did, and therefore almost always look abandoned.What if, instead of a personal blog, you created a portfolio site and worked on a series of sustainable and discrete projects?— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 10, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Yeah, but that’s just another view. I’m thinking overall look and feel of my site. Thinking about changing it to more a portfolio style— Christian Mohn™ (@h0bbel) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

My problem, or one of them, is that everywhere I look - portfolios are mostly done by more creative types, like designers and so on, so I’m having some problems seeing how I should do it for myself— Christian Mohn™ (@h0bbel) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

To me, it implies a vision of completion. I wonder if articles can be retrofit into these types of collections. Or maybe I'm not following what you mean by "portfolios"— Matt Broberg (@mbbroberg) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I was thinking of anything but displaying by last date - lists of articles by topic, bundling into study guides, etc. Might lead to ideas about other kinds of projects - mini-ebooks, series of talks, collaborative, etc.— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I have no concrete examples (yet) but I haven’t looked really. Driven by 1. seeing dead blogs & realizing blog design trades simplicity for precisely this never-ending treadmill, shaping certain kinds of thinking & content, and...— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

2. Listening to podcasts with authors; watching documentaries on artist Olafur Eliasson & Hamilton musical. Thinking how nice it would be to talk about a series of Cool Things you did rather than the rabbit poop of a blog or podcast that you can never wind down cleanly by design.— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I guess that mixed up with speculating if we need personal sites at all when the conversation has shifted to social platforms? Should we publish our everywhere and use IndieWeb/Fediverse tech to syndicate to a central place?— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

That’s it.That’s the whole idea. I’ll turn it into a blog post. Then need to look around with fresh eyes for examples, experiment. Maybe it’s just a front page of articles by topic instead date? Or start a new movement of small ebooks? More ideas out there than in my brain.— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 14, 2019
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Framing things as just using a “blog” in reverse chronological order is a tough one. I might recommend having a website that does much more. It could be a business card, have a blog, have a portfolio, it could have collections, series, etc. The real key at the end of the day is having a website you own and control to put on it what you’d like. This way you can decide not only how to represent yourself on line but how you communicate.
Perhaps another interesting place to start thinking about this is Mike Caulfield’s post The Garden and the Stream: A Technopastoral, which also looks closely at wikis as a separate framing?
Other than a blog, another common pattern is to have a /Now page which describes what you’ve been up to lately. (The problem with this is keeping it up to date on a frequent basis, and you might get back to the problem of having a blog which hasn’t been updated in a while.)
Of course, why not take back control of all of your social presence and put that on your site too? That way your social stream on your site will more frequently be up to date. This is roughly what I do on my site at /blog. It’s not just a stream of longer articles, but of all my social posts, photos, checkins, and other interactions. Of course if you just want the longer form stuff, that’s available too.
For some examples on portfolios, perhaps try the IndieWeb wiki which has some examples and links to other resources.
I like John Mark Troyer’s idea of mini-ebooks and collections of projects. I’ve got a collection of some of my IndieWeb experiments with WordPress that touches on his idea, but eventually I’ll roll some of it up into a book of some sort.
I’ll also indicate another idea being that of having a site that acts like a digital commonplace book, which is roughly how I use my website. I keep a lot of the content primarily for myself, but it does have some social interest for those who may appreciate that I’ve aggregated it in one place.

I guess that mixed up with speculating if we need personal sites at all when the conversation has shifted to social platforms? Should we publish our everywhere and use IndieWeb/Fediverse tech to syndicate to a central place?
— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 14, 2019

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
While the conversation has (temporarily?) shifted to social platforms, I don’t think that it’s always going to stay there. The barriers and issues with owning, controlling, and maintaining a website are coming down every day. Why would one want/need dozens or more social sites to communicate when they should be able to do it in one place–on their own site? Just like I can use my phone and phone number with AT&T service to call you on your phone number with Sprint service, I should be able to use WordPress on my domain to chat/@mention you on your domain running any other CMS. Eventually social media will decentralize, though there still may be a place for aggregation hubs for discovery. I’ll mention passingly that individual websites can also act as stand-alone members of the Fediverse. While not the prettiest thing at the moment because of limitations of the Fediverse, you can follow my website here @chrisaldrich@boffosocko.com from Mastodon and other Fediverse instances. Simultaneously feed readers are improving to better allow users to read what they want without relying on social services to control it for them.

Two sides of a mirror for sure, although the mf’ers always like to make the API-posted content uglier, and there’s an ineffable “presence” that can get lost with POSSE. Are you “there” or are you just dropping off your posts like some flyer for lessons on a store bulletin board?
— John Mark Troyer (@jtroyer) November 14, 2019

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
In the past, many people have indiscriminately syndicated material from one social site to another, but it generally never looks good unless it’s done very carefully. Naturally none of the corporate silos make this type of syndication easy because it’s not in their financial interest to do so–they’d rather you used their services exclusively. This is part of what makes it look like one is dropping off fliers. However, I would suggest that with a more IndieWeb approach that syndicating via POSSE and using appropriate backfeed via webmention, that one can have not only a reasonably organic experience, but you can add a lot more to a much bigger (and hopefully more substantive) conversation. POSSE is a temporary bandaid until we’ve been able to reshape the web the way we want to consume it rather than being forced into consumption on social media services’ terms.
Hopefully this post itself is an example of a response to a larger stream of content that provides a bit more space than Twitter’s 280 character limit would have otherwise allowed. This post might also indicate that a conversation online doesn’t need to be so forced and linear or crammed within Twitter’s restrictive confines. Twitter forces us into a stream as a means of getting us to scroll endlessly rather than think, mull, and respond. It’s not unnoticed by me that the tweet that started this thread has branched off into half a dozen different, but related conversations. This makes even Twitter’s UI difficult to navigate and respond to appropriately. We definitely need (and deserve) something better. If they won’t do it for us, then why not take the means of production and do it ourselves.
You’ve asked some excellent questions. I can’t wait to see your experiments and what you end up making John.

Syndicated copies to:
WordPress
Twitter icon

Twitter icon