I’ve read a fair amount about acrylamide in the past two years following the news that just about anything cooked or fried has small trace amounts of the substance, so I know there’s not too much to be worried about. The biggest “scare” was apparently over french fries–particularly those served at fast food restaurants. Apparently after the scare blew over the general public – the subject just didn’t seem to catch any traction aside from a few snippets in the mainstream press–Starbucks has decided to get out ahead of this “non-issue” just in case. (I will admit that the State of California has actually sued and won against major corporations under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code section 25249.6, also known as “Proposition 65,” that businesses must provide persons with a “clear and reasonable warning” before exposing individuals to these chemicals which includes acrylamide.)
As an aside, I will mention that placing the warning on the condiments counter which I visit only after I’ve made my purchase seems a bit after-the-fact – it would have done me more good in front of the cash register. For the ambulance chasers, this is probably great “grounds”–pun intended–for a major class action.
While I laud their savvy general counsel, do we really need this type of notice in our lives? Humankind has been living with acrylamide cancer risk since the dawn of the Holocene when man first learned to use fire to cook, is there any reason to worry about it now?
I’m reminded of Jared Diamond’s book The World Until Yesterday and some of the things that primitive societies simply learn to live with, but which our overly litigious society just can’t seem to deal with logically. Simple things didn’t fool primitive societies like: don’t sleep under trees that look like they are dead or possibly rotting–just in case the tree falls over and kills you in the night while you’re sleeping. Yet somehow some of us need additional warnings about our coffee from McDonald’s being served hot or cautions not to operate our toasters in the bathtub.
Next I fear that we’ll discover we need signs telling us that pinecones might fall out of pine trees.
I sure hope that Henny Penny copyrighted, registered, and patented everything about the concept of “The Sky is Falling” as I’m sure it’ll have made her the richest chicken in the world.
7 thoughts on “Starbucks Causes Cancer!?”
There may be something to that perhaps. I am a 5 year employee of Starbucks and drank their coffee every day. I am 31 years young and was just diagnosed with breast cancer. Really young for that. Now im wondering
Barbara, I certainly wouldn’t rush to jump to that assumption. To test it you’d need to compare the rates of cancer among Starbucks employees with similar consumption to those of the general population and my hypothesis is that they are probably not significantly different.
Though you are young (statistically speaking) for having cancer, there are a VERY broad range of other genetic and epigenetic factors that may be at fault. Given that all of humankind has been living with acrylamide since the dawn of cooking in the Holocene, the statistical likelihood that it is the root cause of your cancer is exceedingly low – this fact is what I was being sarcastic about in my post.
I hope you’re seeing a competent oncologist for treatment. Best of luck in your struggle to overcome cancer!
Its crazy that cancer rates are going up and people still defend cancer causing chemicals etc. Like they are experts lol what a joke. I know, go wash your hands with benzene. Shut up if your not an expert or get out of the way so others can fix shit.
Starbucks Causes Cancer boffosocko.com/2013/09/28/sta… if the coffee doesn’t kill you the illegal Islamic serving it will but climate change.
tashavanderbilt: Starbucks Causes Cancer boffosocko.com/2013/09/28/sta… … if the co.. dld.bz/fwdEP