We’re being trained to dip our toes into a rapidly flowing river and not focus on deeper ideas and thoughts or reflect on longer pieces further back in our history.
On the other hand, reading more and more from my variety of feed readers, I realize that on the broader web, I’m seeing people linking to and I’m also reading much older blog posts. In the last few days alone I’ve seen serious longform material from 2001, 2005, 2006, 2011, and 2018 just a few minutes ago.
The only time I see long tail content on Twitter is when someone has it pinned to the top of their page.
Taking this a level deeper, social is thereby forcing us to not only think shallowly, but to make our shared histories completely valueless. This is allowing some to cry fake news and rewrite history and make it easier for their proponents to consume it and believe it all. Who cares about the scandals and problems of yesterday when tomorrow will assuredly be better? And then we read the next Twitter-based treat and start the cycle all over again.
@c FYI, @adders wrote a great piece about recency killing the web last year (with some useful conversation here), and it’s a great companion to yours 👍
@smokey For some reason I had to blog about this at 11:20pm last night. bix.blog/2019/12/1…
How do you converse with a wiki?
Syndicated copies:
How do you converse with a wiki?
Syndicated copies:
@bix You were more cogent at 11:20pm than I was! (That makes me think that the “What’s New” page on my website proper perhaps should offer a feed—or maybe that’s a job for
h-feed
.)