Replied to a tweet (Twitter)
I sort of like the idea of networked thought via digital commonplace books. Being able to carry on longer conversations between notebooks in a sense. It shouldn’t matter how long or short the conversation is.

I attempt to do this with my own website(s) leveraging Webmentions for the back-and-forth portions. Twitter is often just a simple notification mechanism for those who don’t have that support yet.

Published by

Chris Aldrich

I'm a biomedical and electrical engineer with interests in information theory, complexity, evolution, genetics, signal processing, IndieWeb, theoretical mathematics, and big history. I'm also a talent manager-producer-publisher in the entertainment industry with expertise in representation, distribution, finance, production, content delivery, and new media.

8 thoughts on “”

    1. Forum, yes, a bit. But that’s centralized. I want to own the copy of my own notebook and what’s in it, but still communicate. On a forum someone else (typically) owns it and might take it down.

      The other option is to use a forum or aggregation hub to aid in discovery. So we might have our own online digital notebooks but syndicate copies or links to our content to a site like indieweb.xyz where others could subscribe to a topic (similar to Reddit), but there’s still two-way conversation capable between individual users who still own and maintain all their own data without worries about corporations memory-holing it. The best of both worlds? (See https://indieweb.xyz/en/commonplace_books for a potential case in point).

      Syndicated copies:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *