A lot of your post also reminds me of Bryan Alexander’s relatively recent post I defy the world and to go back to RSS.
I completely get the concept of what you’re getting at with harkening back to the halcyon days of RSS. I certainly love, use, and rely on it heavily both for consumption as well as production. Of course there’s also still the competing standard of Atom still powering large parts of the web (including GNU Social networks like Mastodon). But almost no one looks back fondly on the feed format wars…
I think that while many are looking back on the “good old days” of the web, that we not forget the difficult and fraught history that has gotten us to where we are. We should learn from the mistakes made during the feed format wars and try to simplify things to not only move back, but to move forward at the same time.
Today, the easier pared-down standards that are better and simpler than either of these old and and difficult specs is simply adding Microformat classes to HTML (aka P.O.S.H) to create feeds. Unless one is relying on pre-existing infrastructure like WordPress, building and maintaining RSS feed infrastructure can be difficult at best, and updates almost never occur, particularly for specifications that support new social media related feeds including replies, likes, favorites, reposts, etc. The nice part is that if one knows how to write basic html, then one can create a simple feed by hand without having to learn the mark up or specifics of RSS. Most modern feed readers (except perhaps Feedly) support these new h-feeds as they’re known. Interestingly, some CMSes like WordPress support Microformats as part of their core functionality, though in WordPress’ case they only support a subsection of Microformats v1 instead of the more modern v2.
For those like you who are looking both backward and simultaneously forward there’s a nice chart of “Lost Infractructure” on the IndieWeb wiki which was created following a post by Anil Dash entitled The Lost Infrastructure of Social Media. Hopefully we can take back a lot of the ground the web has lost to social media and refashion it for a better and more flexible future. I’m not looking for just a “hipster-web”, but a new and demonstrably better web.

Some of the desire to go back to RSS is built into the problems we’re looking at with respect to algorithmic filtering of our streams (we’re looking at you Facebook.) While algorithms might help to filter out some of the cruft we’re not looking for, we’ve been ceding too much control to third parties like Facebook who have different motivations in presenting us material to read. I’d rather my feeds were closer to the model of fine dining rather than the junk food that the-McDonald’s-of-the-internet Facebook is providing. As I’m reading Cathy O’Neil’s book Weapons of Math Distraction, I’m also reminded that the black box that Facebook’s algorithm is is causing scale and visibility/transparency problems like the Russian ad buys which could have potentially heavily influenced the 2017 election in the United States. The fact that we can’t see or influence the algorithm is both painful and potentially destructive. If I could have access to tweaking a third-party transparent algorithm, I think it would provide me a lot more value.
As for OPML, it’s amazing what kind of power it has to help one find and subscribe to all sorts of content, particularly when it’s been hand curated and is continually self-dogfooded. One of my favorite tools are readers that allow one to subscribe to the OPML feeds of others, that way if a person adds new feeds to an interesting collection, the changes propagate to everyone following that feed. With this kind of simple technology those who are interested in curating things for particular topics (like the newsletter crowd) or even creating master feeds for class material in a planet-like fashion can easily do so. I can also see some worthwhile uses for this in journalism for newspapers and magazines. As an example, imagine if one could subscribe not only to 100 people writing about #edtech, but to only their bookmarked articles that have the tag edtech (thus filtering out their personal posts, or things not having to do with edtech). I don’t believe that Feedly supports subscribing to OPML (though it does support importing OPML files, which is subtly different), but other readers like Inoreader do.
I’m hoping to finish up some work on my own available OPML feeds to make subscribing to interesting curated content a bit easier within WordPress (over the built in, but now deprecated link manager functionality.) Since you mentioned it, I tried checking out the OPML file on your blog hoping for something interesting in the #edtech space. Alas… 😉 Perhaps something in the future?
Reply to Laying the Standards for a Blogging Renaissance by Aaron Davis (@mrkrndvs) #edtech boffosocko.com/2017/10/27/rep…
algorithmic filtering of our streams is a huge, huge problem. What a disaster.
“I’m not looking for just a ‘hipster-web’, but a new and demonstrably better web” @ChrisAldrich on the #IndieWeb boffosocko.com/2017/10/27/rep…
Thank U . Will reply in more detail in time, just wonder what level of plan you need to ‘subscribe’ to a OPML in @inoreader?
@mrkrndvs @johnjohnston And what a nicel OPML list/blogroll you’ve got there! Thanks for sharing!https://readwriterespond.com/wp-links-opml.php
Syndicated copies:
Aaron mentioned this reply on readwriterespond.com.
Aaron Davis mentioned this reply on collect.readwriterespond.com.
Aaron Davis mentioned this reply on collect.readwriterespond.com.
A reflection on my inquiry into communication this year and all of the lessons learnt along the way.
Is there a limit? Chris, I love how your site just keeps on developing. I am not sure if I am going to start adding such stories to my site, but it really gives me hope about a better web.
Chris Aldrich mentioned this reply on boffosocko.com.
Syndicated copies:
Chris Aldrich mentioned this reply on boffosocko.com.
Syndicated copies:
Chris Aldrich mentioned this reply on boffosocko.com.
Syndicated copies:
Chris Aldrich mentioned this reply on boffosocko.com.
Syndicated copies:
Chris Aldrich mentioned this reply on boffosocko.com.
Syndicated copies:
tag:facebook.com,2013:10101559856676565_liked_by_10100959863268165
Winston Tabb
https://www.facebook.com/5410052/posts/10101559856676565#liked-by-10100959863268165
tag:facebook.com,2013:10101559856676565_liked_by_10100959863268165
Winston Tabb
https://www.facebook.com/5410052/posts/10101559856676565#liked-by-10100959863268165
tag:facebook.com,2013:10101559856676565_liked_by_10154721789467491
Michael Kirk
https://www.facebook.com/5410052/posts/10101559856676565#liked-by-10154721789467491
tag:facebook.com,2013:10101559856676565_liked_by_10154721789467491
Michael Kirk
https://www.facebook.com/5410052/posts/10101559856676565#liked-by-10154721789467491
There are some who complain about the effort associated with commenting from my own site, especially when you often have to comment on the other site as well. Yet without people making this ‘sacrifice’ for a deomstratebly better web.
Aaron Davis mentioned this reply on collect.readwriterespond.com.
Syndicated copies:
Aaron Davis mentioned this reply on readwriterespond.com.
Syndicated copies:
Aaron Davis mentioned this reply on readwriterespond.com.
Syndicated copies:
Aaron Davis mentioned this reply on collect.readwriterespond.com.
Syndicated copies:
Aaron Davis mentioned this reply on readwriterespond.com.
Syndicated copies:
Annotated Reply to Laying the Standards for a Blogging Renaissance by Aaron Davis by Chris Aldrich (BoffoSocko)
Syndicated copies to: WordPress icon
Hypothes.is Icon
Syndicated copies:
Aaron Davis: Laying the standards for a blogging renaissance – Chris Aldrich also replies