I love that there’s research1
going on in this area and it portends some potentially great things for reading, but the devil’s advocate in me can also see a lot of adtech people salivating over the potential dark patterns lurking in such research. I can almost guarantee that Facebook is salivating over this, though to be honest, they’ve really pioneered the field haven’t they, just in a much smaller area of use. Of course I’m also curious if they did or are planning any research in how people read content on social media?
I wonder what it would look/feel like to take each of these modalities and apply them individually for long periods of time to everything one read? Or to use them in rotation regardless of the subject being read? Or other permutations? I suppose in general I like to read how I like to read, but now I’m going to be more conscious of what and how I’m doing it all.
Grinberg N. Identifying Modes of User Engagement with Online News and Their Relationship to Information Gain in Text. WWW ’18 Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3186180
. Published April 23, 2018. Accessed April 27, 2018.
One thought on “👓 The five ways we read online (and what publishers can do to encourage the “good” ones) | Nieman Lab”
Bookmarked Identifying Modes of User Engagement with Online News and Their Relationship to Information Gain in Text by Nir Grinberg (dl.acm.org)
Bookmarked to read as result of reading The five ways we read online (and what publishers can do to encourage the “good” ones).
[.pdf] copy available on author’s site.