👓 CiteULike News | CiteULike

Read CiteULike is closing down by fergus (citeulike.org)

After nearly 15 years operating CiteULike, we’ve made the difficult decision to close the site. Unfortunately, the costs associated with providing it and the fact that none of us really has any time to put into the maintenance and development of the site mean that we have to call it a day.

We know there are still a number of you out there who use the site regularly and we’re sure you’ll be disappointed but hope you’ll understand.

You will be able to download your library until 30th March 2019 but after that it is likely that CiteULike will no longer be accessible. We will be refunding any Gold subscriptions pro rata that extend beyond that date.

We wish you all success in your research and happiness in your life.

The CiteULike team.

I’m glad I’ve been owning my bookmarks and references on my own site for years, knowing that sooner or later just this day would come.

CiteULike was an interesting service and had a useful bookmarklet and some social features, but had quite a janky looking UI. For those looking for alternates, I recommend not looking at other siloed services, but making an attempt to own your own bookmark posts on your own website. I’m happy to help if you have questions or need pointers.

Published by

Chris Aldrich

I'm a biomedical and electrical engineer with interests in information theory, complexity, evolution, genetics, signal processing, IndieWeb, theoretical mathematics, and big history. I'm also a talent manager-producer-publisher in the entertainment industry with expertise in representation, distribution, finance, production, content delivery, and new media.

6 thoughts on “👓 CiteULike News | CiteULike”

  1. I was never a user, but it sounds like a great service. A real shame it’s shutting down.

    I’m wondering why they aren’t open-sourcing it, that at least would remove the time constraint. If it’s a really useful scholarly tool, then possibly some universities would like to use it/invest some resource in it? For the discovery aspect, federating it sounds like the best option. Each university could offer their instance to their users, and federate it with other universities/educational institutions.

  2. Jonas Voss says:

    I was never a user, but it sounds like a great service. A real shame it’s shutting down.

    I’m wondering why they aren’t open-sourcing it, that at least would remove the time constraint. If it’s a really useful scholarly tool, then possibly some universities would like to use it/invest some resource in it? For the discovery aspect, federating it sounds like the best option. Each university could offer their instance to their users, and federate it with other universities/educational institutions.

    Syndicated copies:

  3. Jonas Voss says:

    I was never a user, but it sounds like a great service. A real shame it’s shutting down.

    I’m wondering why they aren’t open-sourcing it, that at least would remove the time constraint. If it’s a really useful scholarly tool, then possibly some universities would like to use it/invest some resource in it? For the discovery aspect, federating it sounds like the best option. Each university could offer their instance to their users, and federate it with other universities/educational institutions.

  4. Jonas Voss says:

    I was never a user, but it sounds like a great service. A real shame it’s shutting down.

    I’m wondering why they aren’t open-sourcing it, that at least would remove the time constraint. If it’s a really useful scholarly tool, then possibly some universities would like to use it/invest some resource in it? For the discovery aspect, federating it sounds like the best option. Each university could offer their instance to their users, and federate it with other universities/educational institutions.

  5. Jonas Voss says:

    I was never a user, but it sounds like a great service. A real shame it’s shutting down.

    I’m wondering why they aren’t open-sourcing it, that at least would remove the time constraint. If it’s a really useful scholarly tool, then possibly some universities would like to use it/invest some resource in it? For the discovery aspect, federating it sounds like the best option. Each university could offer their instance to their users, and federate it with other universities/educational institutions.

  6. Jonas Voss says:

    I was never a user, but it sounds like a great service. A real shame it’s shutting down.

    I’m wondering why they aren’t open-sourcing it, that at least would remove the time constraint. If it’s a really useful scholarly tool, then possibly some universities would like to use it/invest some resource in it? For the discovery aspect, federating it sounds like the best option. Each university could offer their instance to their users, and federate it with other universities/educational institutions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *