A friend pointed me to a story on Medium called “Death to TypeÂwritÂers,” by Medium deÂsigner Marcin Wichary. The story is about the inÂfluÂence of the typeÂwriter on digÂiÂtal typeÂsetÂting. It refÂerÂences my “exÂcelÂlent list” of typeÂwriter habits.
Highlights, Quotes, Annotations, & Marginalia
MinÂiÂmalÂism doesn’t foreÂclose eiÂther exÂpresÂsive breadth or conÂcepÂtual depth. On the conÂtrary, the minÂiÂmalÂist proÂgram—as it iniÂtially emerged in fine art of the 20th cenÂtury—has been about diÂvertÂing the viewer’s atÂtenÂtion from overt signs of auÂthorÂship to the deeper puÂrity of the ingredients. ❧
This also sounds like a great way to cook!
Like all nonÂsense, it’s inÂtended to be easy to swalÂlow. ❧
You’re givÂing up far more than deÂsign choice. Mr. Williams deÂscribes Medium’s key benÂeÂfit as resÂcuÂing writÂers from the “terÂriÂble disÂtracÂtion” of forÂmatÂting chores. But conÂsider the cost. Though he’s baitÂing the hook with deÂsign, he’s also askÂing you, the writer, to let him conÂtrol how you ofÂfer your work to readÂers. MeanÂing, to get the full benÂeÂfit of Medium’s deÂsign, you have to let your story live on Medium, send all your readÂers to Medium, have your work perÂmaÂnently enÂtanÂgled with other stoÂries on Medium, and so on—a sigÂnifÂiÂcant concession. ❧
You’re definitely not owning your own data.
Boiled down, Medium is simÂply marÂketÂing in the serÂvice of more marÂketÂing. It is not a “place for ideas.” It is a place for adÂverÂtisÂers. It is, thereÂfore, utÂterly superfluous. ❧