👓 Introducing Subscribe with Google | Google

Interesting to see this roll out as Facebook is having some serious data collection problems. This looks a bit like a means for Google to directly link users with content they’re consuming online and then leveraging it much the same way that Facebook was with apps and companies like Cambridge Analytica.

Highlights, Quotes, & Marginalia

Paying for a subscription is a clear indication that you value and trust your subscribed publication as a source. So we’ll also highlight those sources across Google surfaces

So Subscribe with Google will also allow you to link subscriptions purchased directly from publishers to your Google account—with the same benefits of easier and more persistent access.

you can then use “Sign In with Google” to access the publisher’s products, but Google does the billing, keeps your payment method secure, and makes it easy for you to manage your subscriptions all in one place.

I immediately wonder who owns my related subscription data? Is the publisher only seeing me as a lumped Google proxy or do they get may name, email address, credit card information, and other details?

How will publishers be able (or not) to contact me? What effect will this have on potential customer retention?

Published by

Chris Aldrich

I'm a biomedical and electrical engineer with interests in information theory, complexity, evolution, genetics, signal processing, IndieWeb, theoretical mathematics, and big history. I'm also a talent manager-producer-publisher in the entertainment industry with expertise in representation, distribution, finance, production, content delivery, and new media.

2 thoughts on “👓 Introducing Subscribe with Google | Google”

  1. The Google News Initiative: Building a stronger future for news by Philipp Schindler (www.blog.google)

    We are launching the Google News Initiative, an effort to help journalism thrive in the digital age.

    This article is even more interesting in light of the other Google blog post I read earlier today entitled Introducing Subscribe with Google. Was today’s roll out pre-planned or is Google taking an earlier advantage of Facebook’s poor position this week after the “non-data breach” stories that have been running this past week?
    There’s a lot of puffery rhetoric here to make Google look more like an arriving hero, but I’d recommend taking with more than a few grains of salt.
    Highlights, Quotes, & Marginalia

    It’s becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish what’s true (and not true) online.

    we’re committing $300 million toward meeting these goals.

    I’m curious what their internal projections are for ROI?

    People come to Google looking for information they can trust, and that information often comes from the reporting of journalists and news organizations around the world.

    Heavy hit in light of the Facebook data scandal this week on top of accusations about fake news spreading.

    That’s why it’s so important to us that we help you drive sustainable revenue and businesses.

    Compared to Facebook which just uses your content to drive you out of business like it did for Funny or Die.
    Reference: How Facebook is Killing Comedy

    we drove 10 billion clicks a month to publishers’ websites for free.

    Really free? Or was this served against ads in search?

    We worked with the industry to launch the open-source Accelerated Mobile Pages Project to improve the mobile web

    There was some collaborative outreach, but AMP is really a Google-driven spec without significant outside input.
    See also: http://ampletter.org/

    We’re now in the early stages of testing a “Propensity to Subscribe” signal based on machine learning models in DoubleClick to make it easier for publishers to recognize potential subscribers, and to present them the right offer at the right time.

    Interestingly the technology here isn’t that different than the Facebook Data that Cambridge Analytica was using, the difference is that they’re not using it to directly impact politics, but to drive sales. Does this mean they’re more “ethical”?

    With AMP Stories, which is now in beta, publishers can combine the speed of AMP with the rich, immersive storytelling of the open web.

    Is this sentence’s structure explicitly saying that AMP is not “open web”?!
    Syndicated copies to:



    Author: Chris Aldrich

    I'm a biomedical and electrical engineer with interests in information theory, complexity, evolution, genetics, signal processing, theoretical mathematics, and big history.

    I’m also a talent manager-producer-publisher in the entertainment industry with expertise in representation, distribution, finance, production, content delivery, and new media.
    View all posts by Chris Aldrich

    Syndicated copies:

    Reply

  2. The Google News Initiative: Building a stronger future for news by Philipp Schindler (www.blog.google)

    We are launching the Google News Initiative, an effort to help journalism thrive in the digital age.

    This article is even more interesting in light of the other Google blog post I read earlier today entitled Introducing Subscribe with Google. Was today’s roll out pre-planned or is Google taking an earlier advantage of Facebook’s poor position this week after the “non-data breach” stories that have been running this past week?
    There’s a lot of puffery rhetoric here to make Google look more like an arriving hero, but I’d recommend taking with more than a few grains of salt.
    Highlights, Quotes, & Marginalia

    It’s becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish what’s true (and not true) online.

    we’re committing $300 million toward meeting these goals.

    I’m curious what their internal projections are for ROI?

    People come to Google looking for information they can trust, and that information often comes from the reporting of journalists and news organizations around the world.

    Heavy hit in light of the Facebook data scandal this week on top of accusations about fake news spreading.

    That’s why it’s so important to us that we help you drive sustainable revenue and businesses.

    Compared to Facebook which just uses your content to drive you out of business like it did for Funny or Die.
    Reference: How Facebook is Killing Comedy

    we drove 10 billion clicks a month to publishers’ websites for free.

    Really free? Or was this served against ads in search?

    We worked with the industry to launch the open-source Accelerated Mobile Pages Project to improve the mobile web

    There was some collaborative outreach, but AMP is really a Google-driven spec without significant outside input.
    See also: http://ampletter.org/

    We’re now in the early stages of testing a “Propensity to Subscribe” signal based on machine learning models in DoubleClick to make it easier for publishers to recognize potential subscribers, and to present them the right offer at the right time.

    Interestingly the technology here isn’t that different than the Facebook Data that Cambridge Analytica was using, the difference is that they’re not using it to directly impact politics, but to drive sales. Does this mean they’re more “ethical”?

    With AMP Stories, which is now in beta, publishers can combine the speed of AMP with the rich, immersive storytelling of the open web.

    Is this sentence’s structure explicitly saying that AMP is not “open web”?!
    Syndicated copies to:




    Author: Chris Aldrich

    I'm a biomedical and electrical engineer with interests in information theory, complexity, evolution, genetics, signal processing, theoretical mathematics, and big history.

    I’m also a talent manager-producer-publisher in the entertainment industry with expertise in representation, distribution, finance, production, content delivery, and new media.
    View all posts by Chris Aldrich

    Syndicated copies:

    Reply

Mentions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To respond to a post on this site using your own website, create your post making sure to include the (target) URL/permalink for my post in your response. Then enter the URL/permalink of your response in the (source) box and click the 'Ping me' button. Your response will appear (possibly after moderation) on my page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Learn More)