👓 Winner-Take-All Electoral Practice Faces Voter-Rights Challenge | Bloomberg

Read Winner-Take-All Electoral Practice Faces Voter-Rights Challenge by Laurel Brubaker Calkins (Bloomberg.com)
Civil rights activists are challenging the legality of four states’ winner-take-all method of allocating U.S. presidential electoral college votes, claiming the practice magnifies some votes at the expense of others and violates voters’ constitutional rights.

This is a very creative way of attacking this problem. We definitely need to restructure our processes and get rid of the Electoral College

Syndicated copies to:

Trump’s Electoral College Victory Ranks 46th in 58 Elections | The New York Times

Read Trump’s Electoral College Victory Ranks 46th in 58 Elections (nytimes.com)
Putting the president-elect’s win in context.

Continue reading “Trump’s Electoral College Victory Ranks 46th in 58 Elections | The New York Times”

Syndicated copies to:

A Historic Number of Electors Defected, and Most Were Supposed to Vote for Clinton | The New York Times

Read A Historic Number of Electors Defected, and Most Were Supposed to Vote for Clinton (nytimes.com)
Results of the U.S. electoral vote.

Continue reading “A Historic Number of Electors Defected, and Most Were Supposed to Vote for Clinton | The New York Times”

Syndicated copies to:

Chris Aldrich is reading “The Troubling Reason the Electoral College Exists”

Read The Troubling Reason the Electoral College Exists by Akhil Reed Amar (TIME.com)
The Founding Fathers had something particular in mind when they set up the U.S. presidential election system: slavery
Syndicated copies to:

Chris Aldrich is reading “Donald Trump’s Lies About the Popular Vote”

Read Donald Trump’s Lies About the Popular Vote (NYTimes.com)(17 hours 2 minutes 32 seconds)
The president-elect seems to feel threatened that more Americans voted for Hillary Clinton.
Syndicated copies to:

Chris Aldrich is reading “Clinton’s Substantial Popular-Vote Win” | New York Times

Read Clinton’s Substantial Popular-Vote Win (nytimes.com)(3 hours 3 minutes 7 seconds)
She won by more than Gore in 2000, Nixon in 1968 or Kennedy in 1960, it seems. And therein lies a dilemma.

When are people going to come around and fix the electoral college? There’s lots of math to support different methods.

Syndicated copies to: